Cooking Process Optimization in Canned Beef Production Using the Response Surface Method

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Food Science and Technology, Maku Branch, Islamic Azad University, Maku, Iran.

2 Department of Veterinary Medicine, Maku Branch, Islamic Azad University, Maku, Iran.

3 Department of Biology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: Canning food is one of the good methods of food preservation. This method will create a good shelf if the principles of preparation are observed. In this regard, the present study aimed to optimize the cooking time and pressure for canned beef production. Methods: In this study, three levels of pressure (1, 1.2 and 1.4 bars) and three cooking times (9, 15 and 18 minutes) were applied. Response surface method was used for pH, phloem weight, water-soluble solids (Brix), and protein content and sensory examinations in the produced products.Results: The results showed that the phloem, weight and the general acceptance of the samples decreased with the increasing of processing time and pressure. Only the linear parameter of process time had a significant effect on the pH at the level of 5%, which increased slightly with the pH of the samples. Conclusion: The results of process optimization showed that the surface response method is an appropriate approach for optimizing the cooking process in the preparation of canned veal.

Keywords

References

  1. Bhandari BR, Howes T. Implication of glass transition for the drying and stability of dried foods. J Food Eng. 1999;40(1):71-9.
  2. Rokni N. Science Technology of meat. 4th ed. Tehran, Iran: University of Tehran Press; 2006.
  3. Mahmoudi R, Zare P. Chemical compounds of meat and their characteristics. Tabriz, Iran: Parivar publisher; 2013.
  4. King M. Spoilage and preservation of food. Food Quality and Standards. 2009 Apr 14:41-59.
  5. Aubourg SP, Lehmann I, Gallardo JM. Effect of previous chilled storage on rancidity development in frozen horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus). J Sci Food Agric. 2002;82(15):1764-71.
  6. Razavi-Shirazi H. Marine technology products, storage and processing principles. 3rd ed. Tehran, Iran: Pars Neghar Press; 2007.
  7. FAO. The FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department has just updated its global fishery statistics to 2005 data Rome, Italy: FAO; 23 March 2007 [Available from: https://www.fao.org/fishery/en/news/36127.
  8. Aubourg S, Medina I. Quality Differences Assessment in Canned Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) by Fluorescence Detection. J Agric Food Chem. 1997;45(9):3617-21.
  9. Seidler T, Bronowski M. Effects of storage time and thermal treatment on the nutritive value of squid (Illex argentinus). Nahrung. 1987;31(10):949-57.
  10. García-Arias MTN, M.P, García-Linares MC. Effects of different thermal treatments and storage on the proximate composition and protein quality in canned tuna. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 2004;54(1):112-7.
  11. Abraha B, Admassu H, Mahmud A, Tsighe N, Shui XW, Fang Y. Effect of processing methods on nutritional and physico-chemical composition of fish: a review. MOJ Food Process Technol. 2018;6(4):376-82.
  12. Ruiz-Roso B, Cuesta I, Perez M, Borrego E, Pérez-Olleros L, Varela G. Lipid composition and palatability of canned sardines. Influence of the canning process and storage in olive oil for five years. J Sci Food Agric. 1998;77(2):244-50.
  13. Murphy RY, Marks BP. Effect of meat temperature on proteins, texture, and cook loss for ground chicken breast patties1. Poul Sci. 2000;79(1):99-104.
  14. Suvanich V, Jahncke ML, Marshall DL. Changes in Selected Chemical Quality Characteristics of Channel Catfish Frame Mince During Chill and Frozen Storage. J Food Sci. 2000;65(1):24-9.
  15. ParvizKoorandeh M, Rahmanifarah k, Nikoo M. Drained weight, fracture percent and fat content evaluation of canned Jinga shrimp ‎‎(Metapenaeus affinis)‎. J Util Cultivation Aquat. 2017;8(10):35-47.
  16. Win NNC, Soe TT, Kar A, Soe YY, Lin M. Effects of Syrup Solution with Different Concentrations of Citric Acid on Quality and Storage Life of Canned Litchi. Open Access Libr J. 2021;8:1-16.
  17. American Oil Chemists SA. Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the American Oil Chemists' Society. Urbana, U.S.: The Society; 1989.
  18. McAfee AJ, McSorley EM, Cuskelly GJ, Moss BW, Wallace JMW, Bonham MP, et al. Red meat consumption: An overview of the risks and benefits. Meat Sci. 2010;84(1):1-13.
  19. Rashidi H. Technology of production of canned products. Tehran, Iran: College of Applied Science and the skill of Agriculture Jihad; 2010.
  20. Duranton F, Marée E, Simonin H, Chéret R, de Lamballerie M. Effect of high pressure–high temperature process on meat product quality. High Press Res. 2011;31(1):163-7.
  21. Ma LY, Deng JC, Ahmed EM, Adams JP. Canned Shrimp Texture as a Function of Its Heat History. J Food Sci. 1983;48(2):360-3.
  22. Mohammadi S, Gharekhani A, Kazempoor R. Investigating the effect of time and pressure changes in the cooking process on some quality characteristics of canned chicken. Vet Res Biol Prod. 2022;35(3).
  23. Lopetcharat K, Park JW. Characteristics of Fish Sauce Made from Pacific Whiting and Surimi By-products During Fermentation Stage. J Food Sci. 2002;67(2):511-6.
  24. Russo GL, Langellotti AL, Genovese A, Martello A, Sacchi R. Volatile compounds, physicochemical and sensory characteristics of Colatura di Alici, a traditional Italian fish sauce. J Sci Food Agric. 2020;100(9):3755-64.
  25. Poulter RG, Ledward DA, Godber S, Hall G, Rowlands B. Heat stability of fish muscle proteins. Int J Food Sci Technol. 1985;20(2):203-17.
  26. Ma Y, Yuan Y, Bi X, Zhang L, Xing Y, Che Z. Tenderization of Yak Meat by the Combination of Papain and High-Pressure Processing Treatments. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2019;12(4):681-93.
  27. Bouton PE, Harris PV, Shorthose WR. The effect of temperature and ultimate pH on the increase in meat toughness resulting from restraint during cooking. Meat Sci. 1982;6(3):235-41.
  28. Fletcher D L, Qiao M, Smith D P. The relationship of raw broiler breast meat color and pH to cooked meat color and pH. Poultry science. 2000; 79(5): 784-88.
  29. Visessanguan W, Benjakul S, Panya A, Kittikun C, Assavanig A. Influence of minced pork and rind ratios on physico-chemical and sensory quality of Nham – a Thai fermented pork sausage. Meat Sci. 2005;69(2):355-62.
  30. Weber CL, Matthews HS. Food-Miles and the Relative Climate Impacts of Food Choices in the United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42(10):3508-13.
  31. Garcı́a-Arias MT, Álvarez Pontes E, Garcı́a-Linares MC, Garcı́a-Fernández MC, Sánchez-Muniz FJ. Grilling of sardine fillets. Effects of frozen and thawed modality on their protein quality. LWT - Food Sci Technol. 2003;36(8):763-9.
  32. Jouquand C, Tessier FJ, Bernard J, Marier D, Woodward K, Jacolot P, et al. Optimization of microwave cooking of beef burgundy in terms of nutritional and organoleptic properties. LWT - Food Sci Technol. 2015;60(1):271-6.
  33. Babatunde A, Kolade JJ, Ayodeji AC. Effects of cooking methods on yields and organoleptic attributes of local chicken parts. Agrosearch. 1997;3(1-2):81-9.
  34. Fletcher DL, Qiao M, Smith DP. The relationship of raw broiler breast meat color and pH to cooked meat color and pH. Poult Sci. 2000;79(5):784-8.
  35.  
Journal of Nutrition,Fasting and Health
Volume 10, Issue 4
October 2022
Pages 282-289

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 10 August 2022
  • Revise Date: 17 November 2022
  • Accept Date: 20 November 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics