Assessment of Knowledge and Consumption Level of Probiotics Dairy Products among the Students and Staff of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

3 Department of Nutrition Sciences, Varastegan Institute for Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

10.22038/jnfh.2020.47848.1259

Abstract

Introduction: An increasing interest concerning probiotics has emerged among the public, researchers, governmental organizations (such as the WHO/FAO), and medicinal and food companies. Little is known about probiotic consumption, despite its increasing availability. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the knowledge of the educated level of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran towards the benefits of probiotics. Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted among 400   academic staff and students at Mashhad University of medical sciences through a designed checklist. The checklist includes demographic characteristic questions (age, sex, marital status, and education level) as well as questions evaluating the knowledge of individuals about the probiotics. Statistical analyses were done by SPSS, Software, Ver. 16.0. Results: The total number of the current study respondents was 400 with the mean age of 36.3 ± 12.8 and a majority of them were males (53.4%, n: 212), married (54.8%), and had an academic position (46.2%). Probiotic knowledge was significantly linked with marital status and those who were at the position of assistant professor (p<0.05). There was a significant association between the consumption of probiotic dairy products and education level (p<0.05), as the highest percentages of participants who consumed dairy products were assistants and associated professors (89.2% and89.1%, respectively). Conclusion: In this study, although the majority of the participants were aware of the presence of beneficial microorganisms in probiotics dairy products, they did not consume adequate amounts of dairy products and dairy-based probiotics. According to the information obtained from this study, there is a need for further education and promotion of the students in regards to the definition, oral benefits, and sources of probiotics.

Keywords


1. Markowiak P, Śliżewska K. The role of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in animal nutrition. Gut Pathog. 2018;10(1):21.
2. Reid G. Probiotics: definition, scope and mechanisms of action. Best practice & research Clinical gastroenterology. 2016;30(1):17-25.
3. group FWw. Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. FAO/WHO, London, ON. 2002.
4. Gatlin III DM, Peredo AM. Prebiotics and probiotics: definitions and applications. Prebiotics and probiotics: definitions and applications. 2012(4711).
5. Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Brain-gut-microbiota axis and mental health. Psychosom Med. 2017;79(8):920-6.
6. Garcia Vilela E, De Lourdes De Abreu Ferrari M, Oswaldo Da Gama Torres H, Guerra Pinto A, Carolina Carneiro Aguirre A, Paiva Martins F, Marcos Andrade Goulart E, Sales Da Cunha A. Influence of Saccharomyces boulardii on the intestinal permeability of patients with Crohn's disease in remission. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(7):842-8.
7. Fanni AK. Medical students’ knowledge of probiotics and their health usage in Jordan. Health Sci J. 2019;8(4):124-30.
8. Pronio A, Montesani C, Butteroni C, Vecchione S, Mumolo G, Vestri A, et al. Probiotic administration in patients with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis is associated with expansion of mucosal regulatory cells. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14(5):662-8.
9. Vitko HA, Sekula LK, Schreiber MA. Probiotics for trauma patients: should we be taking a precautionary approach?. J Trauma Nurs. 2017;24(1):46-52.
10. Sanders ME, Gibson G, Gill HS, Guarner F. Probiotics: their potential to impact human health. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Issue Paper. 2007;36:1-20.
11. Kayisoglu S, Icoz A. Identifying the level of probiotic products consumption of namik kemal university students. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci.. 2015;21(6):1312-6.
12. Markowiak P, Śliżewska K. Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health. Nutrients. 2017;9(9):1021.
13. Turkmen N, Akal C, Özer B. Probiotic dairy-based beverages: A review. J Funct Foods. 2019;53:62-75.
14. Reid G, Jass J, Sebulsky MT, McCormick JK. Potential uses of probiotics in clinical practice. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;16(4):658-72.
15. Hekmat S, Koba L. Fermented dairy products: knowledge and consumption. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2006;67(4):199-201.
16. Kechagia M, Basoulis D, Konstantopoulou S, Dimitriadi D, Gyftopoulou K, Skarmoutsou N, et al. Health benefits of probiotics: a review. ISRN Nutr. 2013;2013.
17. Begum PS, Madhavi G, Rajagopal S, Viswanath B, Razak MA, Venkataratnamma V. Probiotics as functional foods: potential effects on human health and its impact on neurological diseases. Int J Nutr Pharmacol Neurol Dis. 2017;7(2):23.
18. Soni R, Tank K, Jain N. Knowledge, attitude and practice of health professionals about probiotic use in Ahmedabad, India. Nutrition & Food Science. 2018;48(1):125-35.
19. Johnson N, Thomas L, Jordan D. Probiotics: assessing health professionals' knowledge and understanding. Gastrointestinal Nursing. 2016;14(1):26-33.
20. Fijan S, Frauwallner A, Varga L, Langerholc T, Rogelj I, Lorber M, et al. Health Professionals’ Knowledge of Probiotics: An International Survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(17):3128.
21. Erdem N, Derin DÖ. Determınatıon of probiotic food consumptıon habits of university students: the example of selcuk university. Gümüşhane University Journal of Health Sciences. 2018;7(1):87-93.
22. Karimi M, Mirglobayat V. Nutritional knowledge, attitude, and practice of pregnant women based on food guide pyramid. J Health Care. 2017;19(3):125-35.
23. Bogue J, Coleman T, Sorenson D. Determinants of consumers' dietary behaviour for health‐enhancing foods. British Food Journal. 2005;107(1):1-16.